Latest Entries »

Facing West across the Washington Mall, with o...

Facing West across the Washington Mall, with one's back towards the United States Capitol. The Washington Monument and Lincoln memorial are visible in the background. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Saturday, March 24, 2012 the Reason Rally was held at the National Mall as thousands met to exhibit their atheism.  The question that is running through my mind is why?  Why would anyone spend time, money, and energy to attack that in which you do not believe.  I know that the retort to someone like me is that they are not fighting against God, they are fighting against people like me who “brainwash” our children into believing in the superstition of a God who created all of this.  After all, it is much more reasonable to believe that the universe and all it contains just happened.  It is perfectly within reason to believe that thousands of tiny motors are running in our cells all of the time (ATP Synthase Enzyme) and that it was basically just a matter of chance.  Watch the incredible video of this tiny motor to see how unreasonable it is for me to believe in God who is the Creator and Sustainer of life:

Now, back to my original question, why?  Why spend time, money, and energy to fight that in which you do not believe? If you were going to spend time, money, and energy to attack God, which you do not believe in, isn’t this clearly not reasonable.  Therefore, why would you call it a Reason Rally.  As simplistic as it may sound, it makes no sense to fight what you do not believe in.  I’m sure that these same folks don’t believe in Santa Claus, but they don’t invest their lives in fighting against the jolly old elf.  It would stand to “reason” that there should be a rally in which they display how proud they are that they don’t believe in Santa.  After all, millions of kids are being brainwashed into believing that he is faithfully turning out toys at the north pole and that he will be delivering those toys to them on Christmas Eve.  The only reason that they would not be all keyed up about attacking Santa is because they really don’t believe  Santa –  therefore he really doesn’t pose them any threat.  Reasonably speaking, you don’t fight that in which you do not believe.

Looking at it from God’s perspective, it is amazing to find that God does not believe in atheist.  I know I’m quoting God here and the atheist says that he does not believe in God, but since God does not believe in atheist, it is only fair that we give Him equal time.  God says, “. . . that which is known about God is evident with in them; for God made it evident to them” (Romans 1:19).  That is God’s way of saying that they really do believe in God because God has stirred within them to reveal to them that He does exist.  He goes on to say that He has revealed His nature to them and that they see His handiwork every time they see the creation (I do not apologize for the word creation).  “For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse” (Romans 1:20).

Being as we are dealing with a Reason Rally, it is only fair to point out what God said in the very same passage about just how well these folks are reasoning.  He continues, “For even though they knew God, they did not honor Him as God or give thanks, but they became futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened.  professing to be wise, they became fools” (Romans 1:21-22).  That sounds just like the folks that I hear railing against God, anything to do with God, and anyone who does believe in God.

Being the mindless believer that I am, I can only conclude that it would seem that God is right.  Atheist really don’t exist at all.  Those who proclaim themselves to be atheist really do know that He exist,  but they choose to fight against Him.  There is no other way to express the anger that is displayed by these “reasonable” people.   Think about it.  How much time do you spend angry at or attacking what you consider to be a myth.

I think I’ll go spend what little time, money, and energy I have attacking the tooth fairy.

 

It was alarming to hear this morning of the new statistics from the National Center for Health Statistics.  In brief, more women are staying single longer and many are saying, “no” to marriage altogether.  When you add to this that the number of couples choosing to live together has quadrupled the trend is very disturbing.

As I heard this little bit of news this morning it dawned on me that everything in our country is spiritually turning upside down.  While heterosexual couples are deciding that they would rather just live together than get married, homosexual couples are fighting for their rights to get married.  Massachusetts became the first state to legalize same-sex marriage in 2004.  Since that time Connecticut, District of Columbia, Iowa, New Hampshire, New York, and Vermont have joined in the states that have legalized same-sex marriage.  Many of the other states have some form of conditional same-sex marriage and others soon will legalize the practice.

God could not be clearer in His Word as to what defines a marriage.  In the word of God a marriage is between one man and one woman, not between one man and one man or one woman and one woman.  The man and the woman are not to live together and engage in sexual relations before they are married.  Someone well meaning but misinformed Christian will always bring up why they believe the man and the woman who have decided to live together are “married in the eyes of God.”  Jesus apparently did not see these shacking up relationships in that way.  In John 4, when Jesus was in conversation with the Samaritan woman, said, “for you have had five husbands, and the one whom you now have is not your husband (John 4:17).”

The family is the heart and the strength of our country.  As the home departs from the clear teachings of God and adopts the practices of the world, the nation will feel the impact.  God has not given us a specific order for the home because He wants to be some kind of cosmic kill-joy, He has ordered the home in the way He has because He knows far more than we do and He knows that this kind of immoral behavior is harmful.

It is also disturbing that people who think like I do are considered old fashioned, out of step, and then castigated has hate mongers.

Out country is in deep need of repentance (a change of mind) and a turning back to God.

Kirk Cameron has been enduring a vicious attack because of comments he made concerning homosexuality on Peirs Morgan Tonight.  Having been invited to the show to talk about his new movie, Monumental: In Search of America’s National Treasure, he was subsequently asked, “Do you think homosexuality is a sin?”    See the original interview at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhGQUKoH_TE His response was, “I think that it’s unnatural.  I think that it’s detrimental and ultimately destructive to so many of the foundations of civilization.”  He came under attack immediately by pro homosexual celebrities and by gay activists groups, the very groups who are so quick to point all of the reasons that they should have the right to free speech and that we should be tolerant of others.  It would seem that everyone should have the right of free speech and everyone should be tolerated, unless the everyone happens to be a Christian who is saying and believing things that they do not agree with.  Perhaps we should just call this what it is, another attack by the media against a man because he thinks and believes like a Christian.

Ann Curry interviewed Cameron on the TODAY show, after all, its big news that someone said that homosexuality was unnatural and detrimental.  It was unbelievable how biased the questions were that Curry presented to Cameron.  Watch this interview at http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/26184891/vp/46793855#46793855  and note the questions that were posed:

1. “Many people are suggesting that this is hate speech.  Are you encouraging people to feel hate towards gay people?”

What in this remark could possibly be viewed as hate speech?  Kirk Cameron was merely answering a direct question that had been asked of him.  He gave the very answer that Piers Morgan expected to get when he ask the question.  Could it possibly be that the hate is not coming from Kirk Cameron?  Perhaps the hate is not toward the homosexuals but towards evangelical
Christians.

2. “Do you feel any responsibility, saying words like that, that might encourage people to feel that it is ok to mistreat gay people.

Excuse me, but where did he ever say that it was ok to mistreat gay people?  Perhaps they should be centered in on Rosanne Barr’s tweet, “kirk or kurt or whatever cameron is an accomplice to murder with his hate speech,” as speech that would encourage the mistreatment of others.  The attacks of come at Kirk Cameron, not from him.

3. “Why do you say things like this that you know are going to cause people to push back?  Why do you even talk about it, because this is not the first time you’ve been asked to talk about it?  It’s not the first time you’ve made comments that have caused people a lot of alarm.”

Duh.  Could it possibly be that he made the statement because he was asked the direct question, “Do you think homosexuality is a sin?”  What is he supposed to do?  Sit and ask if the question were never ask?  Make up something he does not really believe.  Suddenly change his position and believe something else?

The only way to consider Kirk Cameron as antiquated, out dated, and out of step is to consider God as antiquated, outdated, and out of step.  Now let me see if I can think this out for a minute.  I can believe the liberal elite of Hollywood, or God.  I believe I’ll go with God.  I can believe the liberal elite of the media, or God.  Sorry, God still comes out on top.  I can believe the gay activist groups, or God?  This may be getting redundant but I suppose that the wisdom of God will always trump the wisdom of men.

This next part is a quote of God, not me.

“For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their error.” (Romans 1:26-27)

Perhaps the attack is not so much against Kirk Cameron or christians in general.  Perhaps it is an attack on God.

Is it possible for Christians to come to a place of persecution right here in the United States?  Perhaps it has not really seemed that alarming that prayer has been banned from public schools, or that the nativity at the city square was seemingly so repulsive.  It might not have even seemed like a huge concern that there was a movement afoot to remove “under God” from the Pledge of Allegiance, or “in God we trust” from U.S. currency and coins.  We may have even shrugged our shoulders when we were told that it was unconstitutional to post the ten commandments in public buildings.  We could, of course, continue with many examples of assaults upon the Christian faith.  But could these seemingly innocuous examples of a lack of tolerance toward Christians ever turn into red hot persecution?

Perhaps we should learn from history how persecution arises.  When the Jews were attacked by Hitler, it did not begin as a full out military attack.  When he became Chancellor in 1933, he started by merely proclaiming a one-day boycott against Jewish shops.  That year he also saw to  it that a law was passed against Kosher butchering.  In the public schools Jewish children began to experience restrictions.  By 1935, the Nuremburg Laws deprived Jews of German citizenship.  In 1936, Jews were prohibited from participation in parliamentary elections and signs appeared in many German cities reading, “Jews not welcome.”  We know how this story ends, with the deaths of six million Jews.  Perhaps we didn’t know that it began with a leader just changing a law here and another law there.  I’m sure there were some lifted eyebrows when the law was passed against Kosher butchering, but I doubt very seriously that the people could have ever believed that it would go to the horrible depths in which it ended.

But it all started with a leader just making a few changes here, and a few changes there.

People of Biblical faith are clearly under attack in our country and it is time that we started calling attention to what is taking place.  David Barton is the founder and president of Wall Builders, a national pro family organization that presents America’s forgotten history and heroes, with an emphasis on our moral, religious and constitutional heritage.  Recently he wrote an article in which he contends that President Obama is the most Biblically-Hostile U.S. president that we have ever had.  In this article he lists the many attacks that have come out of the White House against people of Biblical faith.  While I do not have near enough space to list all of the attacks that have taken place, I would like to share with you just parts of this list.  For the full list you can go to wallbuilders.com.

1. Acts of hostility toward people of Biblical faith:  (Barton gives a list of 16, I list only 4)

April 2009  -  When speaking at Georgetown University, Obama orders that a monogram symbolizing Jesus’ name be covered when he is making his speech. (My note:  Founded in 1789, Georgetown University is the oldest Jesuit and Catholic university in the United States.)

May 2009  -  Obama declines to host services for the National Prayer Day (a day established by federal law) at the White House.    (In the same month he does host White House Iftar dinners in honor of Ramadan.)

January 2011  -  After a federal law was passed to transfer a WWI Memorial in the Mojave Desert to private ownership, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the cross in the memorial could continue to stand, but the Obama administration refused to allow the land to be transferred as required by law, and refused to allow the cross to be re-erected as ordered by the Court.

January 2012  -  The Obama administration argues that the First Amendment provides no protection for churches and synagogues in hiring their pastors and rabbis.

2. Acts of hostility from the Obama-led military toward people of Biblical faith: (Barton list 9, I list only 3)

June 2011  -  The Department of Veterans Affairs forbids references to God and Jesus during burial ceremonies at Houston National Cemetery.

September 2011  -  The Army issues guidelines for Walter Reed Medical Center stipulating that “No religious items (ie. Bibles, reading materials and/ or facts) are allowed to be given away or used during a visit.

February 2012  -  The U. S. Military Academy at West Point disinvites three star Army general and decorated war hero Lieutenant General William G. (“Jerry”) Boykin (retired) from speaking at an event because he is an outspoken Christian.

 3. Acts of hostility toward Biblical values: (Barton list 17, I list only 5)

May 2009  -  Obama official assemble a terrorism dictionary calling pro-life advocates violent and charging that they use racism in their “criminal” activities.

July 2009  -  The Obama administration illegally extends federal benefits to same-sex partners of Foreign Service and Executive Branch employees, in direct violation of the federal Defense of Marriage Act.

July 2010  -  The Obama administration uses federal funds in violation of federal law to get Kenya to change its constitution to include abortion.

September 2010  -  The Obama administration tells researchers to ignore a judge’s decision striking down federal funding for embryonic stem cell research.

February 2011  -  Obama directs the Justice Department to stop defending the federal Defense of Marriage Act.

4. Acts of preferentiallism for Islam: (Barton list 8, I list only 3)

April 2010  -  Christian leader Franklin Graham is disinvited from the Pentagon’s National Day of Prayer Event because of complaints from the Muslim community.

April 2010  -  The Obama administration requires rewriting of government documents and a change in administration vocabulary to remove terms that are deemed offensive to Muslims, including jihad, jihadists, terrorists, radical Islamic, etc.

February 2012  -  The Obama administration makes effulgent apologies for Korans being burned by the U. S. military, but when Bibles were burned by the military, numerous reasons were offered why it was the right thing to do.

Why do I call this to your attention?  The first step in taking care of a problem is to realize that one exist.  The fact is, our nation is quickly moving from a place in which many want to silence us to the place in which they do not tolerate us.  When I became pastor of my first church in 1977 I would have never believed that a day was coming that Christians were looked upon as anything more than the finest of citizens in our American communities.  Something has gone terribly wrong.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.